1)
What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did
you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
The
biggest surprise to me is the amounts of steps and things that go into the
process. The amount you have to pre look at and look at during the process and
after.
2)
Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
Obviously
one very confusing thing if you’ve never done it is patent process for
obtaining one. It’s just a lot of different things to take into account.
3)
If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask?
Why?
When
it comes to copyright and patents would you recommend going through a company
who specializes in this or do it alone or with other people in your company?
When
and what did the RULPA start for?
4)
Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree
with what she or he said? How?
The
trademark pitfalls seem to be wrong. I wouldn’t necessarily trust my attorney
without doing my own research or staying away from abbreviations.
No comments:
Post a Comment